Maybe stop accepting submissions, Herr Prof Dr Sauer?
Who needs science if you can have a 75 paper strong special edition by Afrand and Karimi? A guest post by Alexander Magazinov.
By Leonid Schneider, on research integrity, biomedical ethics and academic publishing
Who needs science if you can have a 75 paper strong special edition by Afrand and Karimi? A guest post by Alexander Magazinov.
A tale of brave academic editors fighting those bad, naughty, annoying anonymous whistleblower trolls
From Lesné’s public shame to successful role models of neuroscience like Aguzzi and Tessier-Lavigne.
“We have initiated post-acceptance peer review with independent reviewers… ” – Wiley.
My uninvited contribution to WCRI 2022
“a scientific journal is not a social network, not even a newspaper. People reading papers in FCT are expected to be scientists with a good basis to distinguish between trash and science.” EiC Jose Luis Domingo on new paper by Peter McCullough
Paolo Macchiarini affair: I reproduce the letter Patricia Murray, Raphael Levy, Peter Wilmshurst and myself published in The BMJ on 2 March 2022. I also publish Wilmshurst’s appeal to the UCL leadership.
“I just want to cry right now. I cannot fight this corruption by myself. ” – Elisabeth Bik
Papermill Industry enters its Logical Growth Phage. Smut Clyde explains what coordination polymer chemistry has to do with chickenshit.
Merry Christmas from PNAS









