Imperial Adcock – from Barnes to Iran!
“the College would have been well within its rights to reject all of your allegations…”
By Leonid Schneider, on research integrity, biomedical ethics and academic publishing
“the College would have been well within its rights to reject all of your allegations…”
When your Irish past catches up with your English future.
“the confusion occurred while utilizing prior panels as example ” – emeritus professor Eliezer Masliah
“I am Jorge de Burgos. I believe research should pause in searching for the progress of knowledge. Right now, we don’t need more papers, we rather need more knowledge by going through a continuous and sublime recapitulation to figure out what is true and what is fake” – Aneurus Inconstans
“In the various excellent texts on paper mills the question is discussed why Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology has become a target for fake papers. I oppose the assumption that we simply want to fill pages with pseudo-scientific content. We actually look for quality and good science.” – Prof Dr Roland Seifert, Editor-in-Chief
“PCR reactions run on agarose gels commonly look similar due to artifacts introduced by the agarose gel and comb.” Dr Elsa R Flores, Associate Director, Moffitt Cancer Center
Everyone is talking about Stanford’s President Marc Tessier-Lavigne now. OK, let’s talk about him, and how Stanford deals with research fraud. And then let’s talk about Thomas Rando.
“I am not familiar with Iranian papermills!” – Prof Dr med Henning Madry, Saarland University.
The Schneider Rule says that if you follow one bad scientist, you will meet many other research cheaters among their mentees and collaborators.
“This phenomenon is called “fraud with Photoshop”, dear Dr Wei.” – Aneurus Inconstans