By Leonid Schneider, on research integrity, biomedical ethics and academic publishing
“The professional bloggers are now trying to turn this into a question of research integrity which is deeply misleading, and claim that they are doing this not for financial gain. Judge for yourself!” – Thomas Südhof, Nobel Prize laureate
“Basic and advanced training for researchers should focus much more on self-reflection, openness and a culture of error acceptance.”
Schneider Shorts 16.06.2023 – an evaluation in Strasbourg finds a flyer, trash science from Rome, trash science from Harvard, cures for Long COVID and old age, with a baroque art sale, Latvian cooking recipes, informative Frontiers retractions, and finally, the mystery of who blew up the dam.
“the confusion occurred while utilizing prior panels as example ” – emeritus professor Eliezer Masliah
“PCR reactions run on agarose gels commonly look similar due to artifacts introduced by the agarose gel and comb.” Dr Elsa R Flores, Associate Director, Moffitt Cancer Center
“Dr. Elgazzar is a brilliant researcher”
“I am highly admired by my colleagues for the high level of rigor and reproducibility I continue to apply to research. ” Dr David Danielpour
A tale of brave academic editors fighting those bad, naughty, annoying anonymous whistleblower trolls
“Wrong again Do you have a problem?” – Bob Bloch
From Lesné’s public shame to successful role models of neuroscience like Aguzzi and Tessier-Lavigne.
For Better Science