Zhihan Lv is not just some Chinese papermiller. This simulation researcher peddling simulated research is a Swedish professor at the Uppsala University! Well, not for long, because he was now slapped with preliminary misconduct findings, with much more to come. Lv is currently on a 6 months “leave of absence” till end of July 2024, but he already announced to resign and return to China.
Lv (who often transliterates his name as Lyu) has been employed by Uppsala University since 1 December 2021. His institutional profile lists his achievements:
“I am IEEE Senior Member, Fellow of British Computer Society, Fellow of Royal Society for Arts, Fellow of Royal Society for Public Health, Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, ACM Distinguished Speaker, five times Career-long Scientific Influence Rankings of Stanford’s Top 2% Scientists, Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow, Clarivate Highly Cited Researcher, Elsevier Highly Cited Chinese Researcher, Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award receiver, AMiner 2023 AI 2000 Most Influential Scholar Award Honorable Mention in Internet of Things. I have contributed 500 papers including more than 100 papers on IEEE/ACM Transactions. I’m Editor-in-Chief of Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Syste

As it happens, Smut Clyde just mentioned Lv in his very recent article, quote:
“Lv’s cartel membership manifested as invasions of the References Sections of other people’s papers – in the manner of Nicolas Cage haunting the dreams of strangers in ‘Dream Scenario‘ – which is how he first came to my attention. He went on to contribute to the Hindawi trainwreck by providing journals with a string of corrupted Special Issues.“
Research on Intelligent Trash Can Garbage Classification Scheme
“It’s not as if the Special-Issue Guest Editors or the imaginary ‘Peer Reviewers’ pay attention to the provenance of the images that fill the Figure-shaped gaps, or care whether the supposed alternatives in these horse-races are even algorithms at all.” – Smut Clyde
Papermiller corri-gendered
Alexander Magazinov notified the University of Uppsala about Lv/Lyu’s PubPeer record in October 2023. The accusations are:
- “nonsense references” and “plots are rather made-up than generated from any actual data.“
- “an instance of possible citation farming (Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier)”
- Papermilling for Hindawi: “Lyu is listed as academic editor on 261 papers in Complexity, 82 papers in Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 62 papers in Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, and 16 papers in Mathematical Problems in Engineering, to a total of 421 items. Some are already retracted, for example, this, this and this.“
Cyclotron Branch, Before the Fall
“sadly, no-one could find any other evidence of existence for these festively-named individuals, who may well be Knock-Knock jokes that somehow gained sentience.” – Smut Clyde
Here is one of Lv’s papers Magazinov reported:
Yangda Gong, Min Zhao , Qin Wang , Zhihan Lv Design and interactive performance of human resource management system based on artificial intelligence PLoS ONE (2022) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262398




Here is the official English version of the investigation report by Uppsala University Board for Investigation of Deviations from Good Research Practice:
Two of Lv’s papers were investigated. His coauthor on both, Haibin Lv, affiliated at Qingdao University in China, is very likely a relative of Zhihan Lv, presumably a brother. The former is born in 1979 (source), the latter in 1984. Before coming to Sweden, Zhihan Lv was affiliated with the Qingdao University.
- Zhihan Lv, Yuxi Li, Hailin Feng , Haibin Lv Deep Learning for Security in Digital Twins of Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2022) doi: 10.1109/tits.2021.3113779


- Zhibo Wan , Youqiang Dong , Zengchen Yu , Haibin Lv , Zhihan Lv Semi-Supervised Support Vector Machine for Digital Twins Based Brain Image Fusion Frontiers in Neuroscience (2021) doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.705323
The expert invited by Uppsala to analyse Lv’s papers was the Lund University professor of communications engineering Fredrik Tufvesson. He issued this verdict on these two publications, as referenced by the report:
“Article [1] contains inconsistent results that cannot occur naturally. Article [1] and article [2] show result figures that are exactly the same, even though they should show different things and come from completely different data sets.
Such a similarity between the curves cannot be explained as natural, instead suggesting that [1], [2] or both articles contain falsified or fabricated data. Given the inconsistencies in Figure 6 of [1] and the lack of simulation parameters, simulation scenario and simulation results, it is likely that [1] is based on falsified or fabricated data. This could therefore clearly constitute a case of research misconduct.
Furthermore, [1] contains many strange references and claims that are not supported by the references cited and lacks a reference to a key tool for the study. This is a deviation from good research practice and, due to its systematic misuse of references, it can possibly be seen as a serious deviation from good research practice.”
Here is Tufvesson’s investigative report (his assessment is in English):
The Board shared the expert’s conclusion on finding evidence for research misconduct:
“There are therefore grounds for suspecting that there have been such serious deviations from good research practice that the matter should be referred to the National Board for Assessment of Research Misconduct for further investigation.”
Lv announced to resign voluntarily:
“I know that the development of the school requires the renewal of talents, and due to personal physical reasons, it is difficult for me to adapt to the Swedish winter climate, which leads to my work not going smoothly.
So I hope to take the initiative to resign in near future, so as to avoid wasting the board’s time. I will go back to China this time and actively look for a job. I hope to find a job and settle in China in the future.”
Here are some other clever explanations by Lv:
- “Pubpeer is sometimes considered as extortion site. On some social media, it was revealed that pubpeer had teamed up with Biotech to blackmail the victim. Pubpeer is not always right. They may blackmail me in the later stage.”
- “I don’t know these authors who have added me as co-authors.“
Otherwise, Lv offers to have his papers “corrigendered” (I love this word!) and insists that the fraud was committed before he came to Sweden or carries his Chinese affiliation only. He even angry writes: “Please check paper publish time instead of retraction publish time to compare to my employment time.” As if Lv didn’t use all these, in his own words, “achievements” to successfully apply for a professorship at Uppsala. Lv also asked the university to verify the identity of Alexander Magazinov, one wonders for which purpose.
Oh what Botangled web we weave
“Would it be irresponsible to speculate that all these multiple sets of images being handed around from paper to paper all belong to a papermill? An artisanal, bespoke fabrication studio, catering to a select group of clients? It would be irresponsible not to speculate!” – Smut Clyde
Handed over to the police
This from the report is just priceless:
“On 6 March 2024, Uppsala University was contacted by an American conference organiser (see Appendix 3) with a request to verify an ethics review permit (see Appendix 4) submitted as part of preparatory work on the review process for the 2024 conference. The guidelines state that contributions submitted to the conference describing research involving human subjects must be supported by a permit from the corresponding ethics committee. During the review process, questions were raised about the validity of the ethical approval. The permit was granted to Lyu.”
The US meeting was the 2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interface. Stefan Eriksson, Adviser to the Vice Chancellor on good research practice, informed the conference organisers:
“In Sweden we have a national system for ethical review, see
https://etikprovningsmyndigheten.se/en/
There are no IRB’s as such and Uppsala university do not have one, neither does the ethics address (ethics@uu.se) go to one. The signee of the “approval” does not seem to be an employee here. As far as I understand the matter, this looks like a fake.”
Below is Lv’s ethics approval which he personally forged, even inventing a fictional “Ethics Coordinator” named “Anne-Marie Jackson”. Your amateur psychology guess is a good as mine on why he picked this name and why the letter has Lv’s birthday on it.

Uppsala University’s decision was (highlight mine):
“As regards the letter from the conference organisers, the document claimed to be an ethics review permit may constitute a deviation from good research practice, and may also be suspected of constituting some form of criminal conduct. The written communication has consequently been handed over to the police as part of a police report into suspected fraud.
[…] as there are reasons to suspect that the behaviour may constitute research misconduct, this written communication should also be forwarded to the National Board for
Assessment of Research Misconduct.”
Even more reason to leave Sweden. Fast.
By the way, at the same University of Uppsala:
In bed with Hari and Aruna
Hari Shanker & Aruna, a YouTube influencer couple in Sweden. With or without Rudolph the Red-Faced Liar. And with Anca and Dafin, two totally innocent and upright Romanians. Pushing pig brain juice an SS Nazi invented. You won’t find a better story for Christmas!
Retractions raining
Retractions started to rain for Lv already during the investigation. Including for his own paper, in PLOS One:
Xuecong Zhang , Haolang Shen , Zhihan Lv Deployment optimization of multi-stage investment portfolio service and hybrid intelligent algorithm under edge computing PLoS ONE (2021) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252244
“The PLOS ONE Editors retract this article [1] because it was identified as one of a series of submissions for which we have concerns about peer review integrity and similarities across articles. These concerns call into question the validity and provenance of the reported results. We regret that the issues were not identified prior to the article’s publication.”
Retraction 21 November 2023
These two papers were edited by Lv for PLOS One and were retracted in September 2023:
- ErLe Du , Meng Ji Analyzing the regional economic changes in a high-tech industrial development zone using machine learning algorithms PLoS ONE (2021) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250802
- Fufeng Qiao Application of deep learning in automatic detection of technical and tactical indicators of table tennis PLoS ONE (2021) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245259
These two PLOS One papers were retracted with the same retraction notice on 6 June 2024, Zhihan Lv was editor of the first paper, his brother Haibin Lv edited the second:
- Yilin Deng , Sang-Yun Han , Jianyi Li , Jinjin Rong , Wenyu Fan , Tiancong Sun The design of tourism product CAD three-dimensional modeling system using VR technology PLoS ONE (2020) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244205
- Yang Li, Jiancang Xie , Rengui Jiang , Dongfei Yan Application of edge computing and GIS in ecological water requirement prediction and optimal allocation of water resources in irrigation area PLoS ONE (2021) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254547
In Sweden, everything is publicly available, so here is the quoted communication between University of Uppsala and PLOS Senior Editor for Publication Ethics, Clare McFadden.
McFadden wrote to Uppsala announcing an ongoing investigation and further retractions for papers associated with Lv. She also mentioned:
“”Dr. Lv was a member of the PLOS ONE’s Editorial Board until March 2022, at which point he was removed due to the concerns described in my previous email (potential manipulation of the publication process suggestive of paper mill activity).”
And not just PLOS One divests of Lv’s papermilling. This paper was published in an Elsevier journal in a Special Issue “Internet-of-Things and Cyber-Physical System in Smart City“, edited by Lv himself, and the retracted:
Zhihan Lv , Dongliang Chen , Ranran Lou , Qingjun Wang Intelligent edge computing based on machine learning for smart city Future Generation Computer Systems (2021) doi: 10.1016/j.future.2020.08.037
“Concern has been raised about authorship irregularities in this paper (removal and addition of authors at different stages of the publication process after submission). Changing authors after submission without permission from the editor is against the journal policy […]
In addition to authorship changes, a further issue relates to a Conflict of Interest, as the Corresponding and First Author acted as a Managing Guest Editor for this paper as part of a Special Issue.
The Corresponding Author disagrees with the retraction of the paper and provided some clarification on the authorship points, however, those explanations did not satisfactorily address all the concerns.”
Retraction 15 May 2024
The adventures of Gui and Hui in Nano-land
The hero of this new nano-malfeasance story by Smut Clyde is another Chinese Photoshop-enthusiast, Rijun Gui, a “specially recruited professor” at Qingdao University in China. There is also a female lead, Gui’s wife and colleague Hui Jin. Almost 30 of their papers, mostly published in Elsevier journals, are being discussed on and by PubPeer, one…
As reminder, the corresponding and first author is Lv, his stated affiliation was School of Data Science and Software Engineering, Qingdao University in China. He was caught selling authorships. Next retraction achievement, in Springer:
Bin Jiang , Jiachen Yang , Na Jiang , Zhihan Lv, Qinggang Meng Quality assessment for virtual reality technology based on real scene Neural Computing and Applications (2018) doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2828-0
“The Editor-in-Chief and the publisher have retracted this article. The article was submitted to be part of a guest-edited issue. An investigation by the publisher found a number of articles, including this one, with a number of concerns, including but not limited to compromised editorial handling and peer review process, inappropriate or irrelevant references or not being in scope of the journal or guest-edited issue. Based on the investigation’s findings the Editor-in-Chief therefore no longer has confidence in the results and conclusions of this article.”
Retraction 14 May 2024
Here, Lv’s stated affiliation was this time Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK. Indeed, he used to be a postdoc there.

They happened before I joined Uppsala University
Now, it is good to know that the Uppsala University understands that papermilling is WRONG.
Maybe they should also tell this to their own Rector Magnificus Anders Hagfeldt, who was caught coauthoring fudged papers by known papermillers. Aside of a mild criticism from the Swedish national authority NPOF, there were exactly zero consequences. Read here:
Swedish rector Anders Hagfeldt pronounced innocent of papermilling
“The board’s conclusion is therefore that the deviations regarding figure 2b and 2c in article 1 constitute serious deviations from good research practice”
Thing is, the worst papermilled trash was authored by Hagfeldt before he came to Uppsala, under his former affiliation of EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland. Now observe, two papers from 2017 when Hagfeldt was active professor at EPFL:
Hadi M. Marwani , Muhammad Tariq Saeed Chani , Ekram Y. Danish , Kh.S. Karimov , Anders Hagfeldt , Abdullah M. Asiri Tandem Heterojunction Photoelectric Cell Based on Organic-Inorganic Hybrid of AlPc-H2Pc and n-Si International Journal of Electrochemical Science (2017) doi: 10.20964/2017.05.20
Muhammad Tariq Saeed Chani , Kh.S. Karimov , Hadi M. Marwani , Ekram Y. Danish , Waleed Ahmad , Jamil-un Nabi , M. Hilal , Anders Hagfeldt , Abdullah M. Asiri Bulk Heterojunction Tandem Photoelectric Cell Based on p-Si and Phthalocyanine International Journal of Electrochemical Science (2017) doi: 10.20964/2017.10.55

How on Earth did a Swedish professor in Switzerland get to collaborate with fellow scholars in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and… Tajikistan? A clue: the last author, the towel-headed Saudi Abdullah M. Asiri, who is a chemistry professor at the King Abdulaziz University and a papermiller who publishes fraudulent spectra all the time. Just one example, in an Elsevier journal completely overtaken by papermills:
Saima Gul , Zulfiqar Ahmad Rehan , Shahid Ali Khan , Kalsoom Akhtar , Murad Ali Khan , M I Khan , Muhammad Imtiaz Rashid , Abdullah M. Asiri , Sher Bahadar Khan Antibacterial PES-CA-Ag2O nanocomposite supported Cu nanoparticles membrane toward ultrafiltration, BSA rejection and reduction of nitrophenol Journal of Molecular Liquids (2017) doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.093

Asiri was even seen publishing papermilled fakes with the fraudsters Rafael Luque, Fatih Sen and Yubing Sun. Asiri is an authority on any topic a papermill has on sale, which allowed him to put his name on over 2000 papers and buy 100k citations, making him a “Highly Cited Researcher” with h-index of 139 (Hagfeldt’s is 170).
NPOF can only investigate papers where at least one author has a Swedish affiliation, while both Hagfeldt’s current employer and his former university EPFL categorically refuse to even look at the evidence. As they both told me, the responsibility to investigate lies with the other side.
“It’s not related to Sweden or Uppsala University since they happened before I joined Uppsala University.”
That was actually Lv’s repeated defence, and it wasn’t accepted. It only works for Hagfeldt.
I thank all my donors for supporting my journalism. You can be one of them!
Make a one-time donation:
I thank all my donors for supporting my journalism. You can be one of them!
Make a monthly donation:
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthly

just wanted to say thanks for the great work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Could you please share a link to Zhihan Lv’s research works collection, e.g., an archived googlescholar, RG, Scopus, or anywhere that we can observe his research activity? and other questions; is he, leaving the University connected with the investigation, has he already left Sweden? was he also a WOS highly cited? from which country and with which affiliation? I cannot find it on WOS, can you please share a link?
LikeLike
Very simple. Google “Zhihan Lv”, second hit.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=A2xgAJcAAAAJ&hl=zh-CN
Also:
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2525-3074
LikeLike
It is challenging dealing with Chinese names, take this publication for instance: “Next-generation big data analytics: State of the art, challenges, and future research topics” which belongs to Zhihan Lv but not included in the scholar profile and ORCID that you posted. In this particular publication he uses his UK affiliation. It needs further investigations to distinguish and classify all articles he had participated. I believe the issue is more than what discussed in your article. But at least your post is an initiation to a big issue in the Chinese fake research.
LikeLike
I am sorry my ZH Lv article is not as exhaustive as other sources. Apologies.
LikeLike
And who is this guy? Zhihan Lu? http://www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/people/Zhihan.Lu.html
It seams he changes his Chinese name anytime he uses a new affiliation. No one out there question his names? is it Lu, Lv, or Lyu? and maybe more?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi, Zhihan Lu, Zhihan Lv, and Zhihan Lyu are not same in all the cases. In some articles they are actually different persons. I realised in some articles they are different and some articles they are same with different names. The fact that their profiles are merged in Scopus and OECID wont mean they are same person.
LikeLike
For this ORCID 0000-0003-2525-3074 Here are all his names: Lv, Zhihan • LV, Zhihan • Lv, Zhi han • Lu, Zhihan • Zhihan, Lv • Lv, Zhi Han • Lv, Z. • Lu, Zhi han
and here all his affiliations: 2016 – 2024University College LondonThe institution will open in a new tab 2016 – 2024Qingdao UniversityThe institution will open in a new tab 2018 – 2024UCL EngineeringThe institution will open in a new tab 2021 – 2024Uppsala UniversitetThe institution will open in a new tab 2012 – 2023Chinese Academy of SciencesThe institution will open in a new tab 2022 – 2023State Key Laboratory of Media Convergence Production Technology and Systems 2022 – 2023Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess TechnologyThe institution will open in a new tab 2021 – 2022School of Data Science and Software Engineering 2021 – 2022Politechnika WarszawskaThe institution will open in a new tab 2022University of Uppsa 2022Universitat Politècnica de ValènciaThe institution will open in a new tab 2022Instituto de TelecomunicaçõesThe institution will open in a new tab 2022British Computer Society Fellow 2021University of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaThe institution will open in a new tab 2020Universitat de BarcelonaThe institution will open in a new tab 2012 – 2018Shenzhen Institute of Advanced TechnologyThe institution will open in a new tab 2018Fukuoka UniversityThe institution will open in a new tab 2018Wuhan UniversityThe institution will open in a new tab 2015 – 2017FIVAN 2017Shenzhen UniversityThe institution will open in a new tab 2015 – 2016University Town of ShenzhenThe institution will open in a new tab 2016Sun Yat-Sen UniversityThe institution will open in a new tab 2015Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Neurorrehabilitación FIVAN 2013 – 2014Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetThe institution will open in a new tab 2011 – 2013CNRS Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueThe institution will open in a new tab 2011 – 2013Ocean University of ChinaThe institution will open in a new tab 2011 – 2013Laboratoire de Biochimie ThéoriqueThe institution will open in a new tab 2013Umeå UniversitetThe institution will open in a new tab 2013Université Paris CitéThe institution will open in a new tab 2011 – 2012Institut de Biologie Physico-ChimiqueThe institution will open in a new tab 2012 Zhengzhou University
It is extremely shocking the extent of publishing in IEEE Transactions which is very challenging to publish. This shows the importance of his mafia connection.
LikeLike
Publishing in Transactions requires extensive lab works, 111 Transactions published in following journals is impressive:
“IEEE Transactions On Intelligent Transportation Systems”
“IEEE Transactions On Industrial Informatics”
“ACM Transactions On Internet Technology”
“IEEE Journal Of Biomedical And Health Informatics”
“ACM Transactions On Multimedia Computing Communications And Applications”
“IEEE Transactions On Computational Social Systems”
“IEEE Transactions On Fuzzy Systems”
“IEEE Transactions On Network Science And Engineering”
“IEEE Transactions On Vehicular Technology”
“IEEE ACM Transactions On Computational Biology And Bioinformatics”
“IEEE Transactions On Big Data”
“ACM Transactions On Asian And Low Resource Language Information Processing”
“ACM Transactions On Management Information Systems”
I myself, can only publish once a year.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is an awesome piece of work. You followed it very well. And this time I saw a positive report. I wish other universities could report so clearly.
LikeLike
True IEEE Transactions mafia
LikeLike
It is generally too difficult to publish in IEEE Transactions, in the case of above, the editors of these journals must be questioned and investigated.
LikeLike
Was Zhihan Lv highly cited? in which year?
LikeLike
Publishing so many IEEE Transactions…. just wow
LikeLike
Would be great if an interview with this author included in this article. Please ask him how he could publish in Transactions. Publishing 100 MDPI or other open access journals is not that complicated but 100 transactions leave questions.
LikeLike
a quick look at the transaction articles published by Zhihan shows low quality of these articles. I informed IEEE ethics to check these articles for the possible manipulation of peer-review.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wonder how he managed publishing such low quality papers in Transactions. It is worth an investigation into handling editors of these IEEE journals. Also I wonder if there is any regulation on the Chinese using western or English names. It seams they can adapt any names they want and change it anytime they want.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Since ZH Lv is senior member at IEEE, he may have been the editor of his own papers,. because look, names are different!.Lv / Lyu
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for information and tips. I am looking forward into a follow up on this article. So exciting how it may progress to expose the major players.
LikeLike
As soon as you caught Zhihan red-handed he want to flee to China. He well knows that he made wrong and he has no choice but to run-away. We should not let him get away.
LikeLike
Actually, Lu, Lv, and Lyu can be exact the same last name 吕. Chinese names are spelled using pinyin. 吕 is traditionally noted as Lü, but we do not have the means to put the 2 dots on top, then it ends up as Lu most of the time. As we use Chinese characters anyway, there was never a confusion between Lu and Lü. But as the needs to input names into computer systems, we needed to input 吕 using pinyin keyboard. To distinguish from Lu, which is the pinyin spelling for other last names such as 路鲁鹿卢陆, we adopted v for u on the pinyin keyboard, that’s when Lü became Lv. When the spelling Lv provides no clue for the proper pronunciation, Lyu was created by some to use for Lv as Lyu obviously indicates how to pronounce. Chinese National Immigration Administration issued an official notice in 2021 to change Lü to Lyu on passport.
But I’m not suggesting Lu = Lv = Lyu, but Lv does equal Lyu.
LikeLike
To add some info: The Zhihan Lyu described in this report is 吕智涵, originally from Qingdao University, China (青岛大学). Did a postdoc at UCL then landed a job at Uppsala University.
LikeLike
I know prof. Zhihan Lv at Uppsala University and was asked to be a coauthor in a handful of publications. The fact is that prof. Lv is a hard worker and had to perform finger surgery last year due to permanent damage to his hands, from using computer keyboards.
Many of the papers we cooperated on were not accepted since the journals were prestigious with tough reviewers, but some were published after much work.
Prof. Lv is an extremely kind and generous person, but at the same time, I see that there is a publication system error worldwide when he has to damage his hands to stay afloat.
When he was accused of publishing a few flawed papers (among hundreds he had published), his first concern was to protect his employer and point out that the papers in question were published before he accepted his position at Uppsala University.
He has performed the same work, during the last 20 years, that most researchers perform during a lifetime. And the result is damaged fingers.
However, I praise this homepage for its good intentions. It is clear that the publication panic that exists today within the university world (publish or perish) has made many researchers publish at a higher rate than optimal. What happened to reflection and contemplation one may ask.
Thank you for caring and I hope that we will together improve the present system!
LikeLike
Zhihan Lv wrote to me on 28 September 2024:
“Dear Dr. Leonid Schneider,
Three months ago, I sent you a message but I didn’t receive your response. Yesterday I read your new article which mentioned me again. I think we must have some conflict of interest so you hate me so much. Could you give me a chance to resolve conflicts between us? Let me know what can I do for you.
Best,
Zhihan”
I never replied. Today, this email via my site’s contact form arrived:
Name: Muhammad imran
Email: imran6932252@gmail.com
“I hereby the legal representative of my client Zhihan LV.I am contacting you to make a removal request about the infringing content uploaded on your website without any permissions from the rights owner.
The content in the following reported link is taken from the website of my client.
We are requesting that remove these infringing links from your website to make your platform a beautiful one.
orignal link of my client’s website:
https://www.mariecuriealumni.eu/groups/sweden-chapter
Details of fake content are given below.
Links to infringing content
https://forbetterscience.com/2024/06/19/they-happened-before-i-joined-uppsala-university/
I am hoping a quick response from you.
I have a good faith that all the provided info are correct and I will be responsible under the penalty of perjury.
You can contact us at:
Muhammad Affan.
Basti Mian pheroo Dera ghazi khan Pakistan”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Zhihan Lv still thinks paying a few dollars to a small-time crook in Pakistan will scare me into submission.
Name:
Ali Abbas
Email:
adanjum3486@gmail.com
Message:
Dear Legal Team,
I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to formally request the immediate removal of a defamatory post that has been published on your website. The defamatory post in question was posted on your website without knowing the truth. The post contains false and damaging statements that have caused significant harm to the reputation and well-being of the company.
As you may be aware, defamation refers to the act of making false statements about an individual or entity that harm their reputation. It is my duty to inform you that the defamatory post on your website violates defamation laws and poses legal ramifications for all parties involved. The false information contained within the post has caused substantial harm to company’s professional and personal character.
We kindly request that you remove the defamatory post immediately to prevent further dissemination of false information and to avoid potential legal consequences. Failure to comply with this request will leave us with no option but to pursue legal action against your website and the user responsible for the defamatory post.
Here is the link in question;
In accordance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and the Communications Decency Act (CDA), has a legal obligation to promptly remove defamatory content upon receipt of a valid takedown notice. We trust that, as a responsible platform, will take immediate action to remove the defamatory post and prevent further harm to company’s reputation.
We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and request confirmation of the removal of the defamatory post within reasonable time frame from the receipt of this letter. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.
Thank you for your cooperation. We hope to resolve this matter amicably and without resorting to legal measures.
Regards,
Ali Abbas
LikeLike
In parallel, WordPress received this silly DMCA Take Down notice:
“Subject: URGENT LEGAL NOTICE – Immediate Removal of Defamatory Content.
Dear Legal Team,
This letter serves as a formal and urgent demand for the immediate removal of a defamatory post currently hosted on your platform. The post, accessible at the following link:
contains false, misleading, and damaging allegations that have caused severe harm to the reputation, business standing, and personal integrity of the affected party. The publication of this content, without factual verification, constitutes clear defamation and is in direct violation of applicable laws, as well as your platform’s responsibilities under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and the Communications Decency Act (CDA).
Legal Liability & Immediate Removal Requirement
Defamation, as defined under U.S. law, involves the publication of false statements that cause harm to an individual or entity. The false claims contained in the aforementioned post have already led to irreparable reputational damage and continue to inflict harm.
As the host and publisher of this defamatory content, your platform bears direct legal responsibility for its continued dissemination. Failure to remove this content immediately will result in legal action, including but not limited to:
A formal lawsuit for defamation against your platform and the author(s) of the post.
A court injunction compelling the removal of the content.
A claim for monetary damages arising from reputational and financial harm.
Your Legal Obligations Under the DMCA and CDA
Under the DMCA, online platforms are obligated to remove infringing or harmful content upon receiving a valid notice.
The CDA (Section 230) does not provide immunity for platforms that knowingly host and refuse to remove defamatory content after being formally notified.
This letter serves as official notice of the false and defamatory nature of the post. Your failure to act will constitute willful negligence, exposing your organization to full legal liability.
Final Warning – 48-Hour Compliance Deadline
We demand the immediate removal of the defamatory content within 48 hours of receiving this notice. Written confirmation of removal must be sent to my contact details below.
Should you fail to comply within the stipulated timeframe, we will proceed with legal action without further notice. This matter is of the utmost urgency, and we strongly advise you to act immediately to prevent further legal consequences.
Sincerely,
Mr. Khan
Email:legallawyersection2201@gmail.com “
LikeLike
why you upload my legal draft on your site. Please remove it otherwise I will take legal action against your site.
best regard
MUHAMMAD Affan.
LikeLike
Rofl
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am beginning to suspect that M. Affan is not a lawyer.
LikeLike
New message from Muhammad Imran/Alfan:
“Why you using personal email address on your site?
Share about this.”
LikeLike
It seems that our friend Mr Lv is still publishing papers under Uppsala University:
Risk identification of listed companies violation by integrating knowledge graph and multi-source risk factors – ScienceDirect
Enterprise violation risk deduction combining generative AI and event evolution graph – Zhong – 2025 – Expert Systems – Wiley Online Library
Integrated Digital Twins System for Oil Temperature Prediction of Power Transformer Based on Internet of Things | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore
LikeLike