Below a support letter by Rafael Cantera, professor of zoology at the University of Stockholm in Sweden, addressed to the leadership of the University Clinic Würzburg. This is because two professors of this German university, Thorsten Walles and Heike Mertsching (now Walles) chose to respond to my inquiries about their earlier trachea transplants made from pig intestine (see my detailed report here) with lawyers’ financial blackmail and right after, with court actions, which had me sentenced guilty with a threat of a prison term of 6 months, without my prior knowledge (see case description here). Such are the peculiarities of German law: internet bloggers are basically legally defined here by default as criminals, and professors as infallible and divine beings (in fact, even Walleses’ former boss and collaborator Paolo Macchiarini is still a protected adjunct professor at their former common place of work, the Medical University Hannover). I received lots of support from my readers, and was also invited to give an interview with the French magazine Mediapart (German version here). Now, I am deeply grateful to Prof. Cantera for his support, and hope other international and maybe even German academics join in and sign below.

A conspiracy of German institutions against freedom of information
The Walleses even admitted to their judge in Würzburg that they did receive my questions in advance, but chose not to reply to them. They instead even revealed to the court their immediate intentions to find out my private address and had me slapped with a costly court injunction and a threat of a prison term, from the very beginning. The judge however apparently saw my act of asking inconvenient questions alone as an act of blasphemy against German professors. The only evidence against me which this Würzburg regional court judge actually bothered to scrutinise was the Walleses’ academic employment situation and their current applications to new professorships. That “evidence” fully sufficed to declare me guilty of slanderous libel against two German professors, what I actually wrote about their trachea transplants on my site was utterly irrelevant in this context. It was enough that the Walleses did not like it.
While they and their pricey lawyer prepared this legal attack on basic freedoms of speech and press, their employers, the University of Würzburg and the Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology in Stuttgart, repeatedly refused to answer any of my questions regarding those 3 tracheal transplants, even when requested to do so under legally binding freedom of information law. Most recently, I asked the Fraunhofer institute to explain if any animal testing at all was performed before their researcher Heike Walles delivered in 2007 and 2009 pig-intestine-derived tracheal grafts which her husband then implanted into two patients. The internet biomedical portal PubMed suggests that to the very least, no animal experiments at all were published by the Walleses in this regard, before or after the method was initially first tested on a human patient together with Macchiarini in Hannover in 2004.
Update 23.01.2017: The Fraunhofer Institute admitted that no animal testing was deemed necessary prior to two patient transplants. Details here.
Instead answering my questions, the University Clinic of Würzburg allowed their two professors to use these affiliations to suggest that they were actually acting in court against me as representatives of the entire University Clinic. It went as far that both the University and the University Clinic Würzburg refused to even acknowledge receiving my administrative complaints about their two professors, never mind processing those. My freedom of information inquiries to the German Ministry of Education and Research and the medicinal product watchdog Paul-Ehrlich-Institut about the Walles’ ministry-funded clinical trial and about the approvals for their previous trachea transplants, are as yet unanswered, even after the legally binding time period of one month to deliver a reply has long expired. It is none of nosy public’s business if human experiments in German research institutions (with none of the affected patients being currently alive) were ever properly approved or, if indeed these experiments actually still take place or are being prepared. The status of the aforementioned federally-funded multi-patient clinical trial with pig intestine-made trachea is confidential and not for us to know. If you want to speak of academic conspiracy in Germany, here is a big and a highly unsavoury one.
In fact, the Walles’ lawyer just sent me another threatening letter, demanding of me to accept the court injunction, pay his clients an unspecified compensation damage and him around €1800 lawyer’s fee.

Open Letter in support of Schneider’s investigation of trachea transplants in Germany, by Rafael Cantera
Prof. Dr. med. Georg Ertl, Medical Director University Clinic Würzburg, Germany.
Prof. Dr. med. Matthias Frosch, Dean of Medical Faculty, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
c/c Leonid Schneider
January 15, 2017
Dear colleagues,
For months I’ve been reading in the Swedish press as well as on Leonid Schneider’s blog For Better Science many notes about the scandalous trachea transplantations on human patients in which Dr. Paolo Macchiarini has been involved and for which he’s been, and is still investigated in Sweden. This was an extraordinary scandal for the Karolinska Institute and the Karolinska University Hospital; it has already resulted in several resignations and investigations, including a police investigation of Macchiarini himself. Fortunately, the Swedish authorities and academy adopted an open, self-critical and transparent reaction and in due process questions from journalists were answered, documents were made public, investigations were initiated and conclusions were reported to the public. For his fantastic journalistic investigation of this story “of fraudulent research” that “revealed life-threatening ambition in the academic world” the Swedish journalist Bo Lindquist was awarded the Swedish Grand Prize for Journalism in 2016.
In spite of that, according to the Swedish press and academic colleagues of mine in Sweden and other countries this scandal might have negative, perhaps long-lasting consequences on the public trust and confidence in science and medicine and so, in my opinion, it deserves to be investigated to the last link and detail. If the public trust is to be restored, every trachea transplantation in which Macchiarini and his collaborators were directly or indirectly involved should be investigated and the results must be clearly and openly reported to the public. In doing so, which as a scientist I think is necessary and important, Leonid Schneider started to investigate the activities of the German professors Heike and Thorsten Walles, who were also involved in trachea transplantations and had professional links to Macchiarini and his activities (primarily: Macchiarini et al 2004 and Walles et al, 2004).
Now, after reading about the court trial in Bavaria against Leonid Schneider, I have the unpleasant feeling that it is perhaps the intent to punish him for his investigations and to avoid further investigations of possible misconduct in German universities regarding Macchiarini-related trachea transplantations. This feeling will be supported if it was correct, I as was told, that both research institutions involved, namely the Fraunhofer Society and the University of Würzburg refused to answer questions regarding the two experimental trachea transplants on human patients they performed and later on published (Mertsching et al 2009 and Steinke et al, 2015 ). Moreover, it appears that Professors Walles acted apparently with full approval of their academic employer by using their academic affiliations with the University Clinic Würzburg. The outcome was a court injunction passed in absentia against Leonid Schneider forbidding him to state facts which Professors Walles themselves had been repeating often and widely just some years ago in interviews, press releases, books and research publications.
Leonid Schneider can count with my support and I hope you will also help him in his important investigation, answering his questions and providing as much information as you can disclose.
Yours sincerely,
Rafael Cantera, PhD
Professor
Zoology Institute, Stockholm University
Stockholm, Sweden
Dear readers, If you wish to express your support as well, please comment with your full name and institutional affiliation below.
If you would like to support my court litigation financially, donation amount doesn’t matter, please go to my Patreon site or contact me.

Donate!
If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. Or several of small tips, just increase the amount as you like (2x=€10; 5x=€25). Your generous patronage of my journalism will be most appreciated!
€5.00
Update 4.02.2017. The signatories of this letter have been subjected to an “alternative facts” campaign by Walles’ employee Jan Hansmann. Details here.


I herein declare my sworn support.
Prof. César Monroy-Fonseca, PsyD, MSc
Chief Scientific Officer
SEELE Neuroscience
Lecturer
University of Cloister of Sor Juana
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support Professor Cantera’s letter in support of Leonid Schneider.
Andrey Alexeyenko
Ph.D., associate professor
LikeLiked by 1 person
I strongly support the open letter of professor Cantera.
Victor Avsarkisov
Department of Theory and Modelling
IAP, Kuehlungsborn
Germany
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am sorry to see that Leonid is let down by the german academic system (no german scientist reading and supporting this?!?). A sad state for research when not even higher academic (Uni Würzburg and Fraunhofer IGB) or political (BMBF) institutions in Germany are willing to support scientific transparency, morality and openness.
Keep up the good work, Leonid.
Aleksander Benjak
Scientific Officer
NCCR Molecular Systems Engineering
University of Basel, Switzerland
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support free speech.
Brandon Stell
Chargé de recherche, CNRS
Paris, France
LikeLiked by 2 people
I fully support the letter from Professor Cantera.
Dr Gaetan Burgio
Group Leader
The Australian National University
Australia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Please add my name to the list of signatories.
Philip Moriarty
School of Physics and Astronomy
University of Nottingham
Nottingham NG7 2RD
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Listas de editoras e periódicos predatórios somem da internet, mas aqui estão as cópias | Direto da Ciência
I strongly support the open letter of professor Cantera. See also my note on the topic (in German): https://medium.com/@hannes/stammzellen-und-journalismus-b2f27e9f46e6#.afsgvqqzs
Dr. Hannes Mühleisen
Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully support Professor Cantera’s letter and the freedom of Leonid Schneider to do his inquiries. The key point is that the truth finally emerge from these complex affairs. Previous experiences have shown that we cannot trust academic institutions to provide the information, investigative journalists can play an important role.
Bruno Lemaitre
Global Health Insitute
EPFL Lausanne,
LikeLike
I strongly support Professor Cantera’s letter and the freedom of speech.
Dr Violaine See
Senior lecturer in the Department of Biochemistry
University of Liverpool, UK
LikeLiked by 1 person
I strongly support this letter by Rafael Cantera. Leonid Schneider has done a very important work to promote transparency, honesty and fairness in science. Academia is in great need of people who take on these tasks, which are neither paid, nor always rewarded.
The Macchiarini scandal has severely wounded the trust of the general public in science and it is utterly important that there are scientists who. like Leonid Schneider, stand up for the principles that should guide science. The scientific community should be very grateful for his job.
Agnes Wold
Professor, senior consultant
Clinical Bacteriology
The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Orfani della Beall's list - Ocasapiens - Blog - Repubblica.it
David Bimler
School of Psychology
Masssey University, New Zealand
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for writing this letter. I am happy to add my full support against the intimidation of Leonid Schneider and the diligent and careful work he is doing on behalf of scientific integrity. Shooting the messenger adds even more legitimacy to the idea that this needs even more investigation.
Jim Woodgett
Director, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support investigative journalism and this ruling must not be allowed to stand.
Stephen Royle, PhD
University of Warwick
LikeLiked by 1 person
I strongly support this letter by Rafael Cantera and the the important work of Leonid Schneider.
Gunilla Källenius
MD, PhD, Professor
Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully support the open letter of professor Cantera and the work of Leonid Schneider.
Nicolas Robine
Assistant Director, Computational Biology
New York Genome Center
New York, NY. USA
LikeLiked by 1 person
Count me in.
Luca Turin PhD
Group Leader, Quantum Neurobiology
Stavros Niarchos Foundation Researcher
BSRC Alexander Fleming
34 Fleming St, 16672 VARI, Greece
LikeLiked by 2 people
In support of Leonid Schneider:
Harry Miras, PhD
Lecturer
University of Glasgow, UK
LikeLiked by 1 person