Anatomy of a Retraction 2 – Superconductive Fraud
Maarten van Kampen dispels the superconductive illusions of Ranga Dias and Ashkan Salamat. Will we also receive a cease-and-desist letter now?
By Leonid Schneider, on research integrity, biomedical ethics and academic publishing
Maarten van Kampen dispels the superconductive illusions of Ranga Dias and Ashkan Salamat. Will we also receive a cease-and-desist letter now?
“My attention was first drawn to Blum, Febo & Badgaiyan for what was either a ground-breaking advance in scientific illustration, or an attempt to win the inaugural Cheese Promotion Cup” – Smut Clyde
“not everyone in the research community accepts that the problem requires such attention; some believe it is overblown.” -Jeffrey Flier, emeritus dean of Harvard Medical School
“Dr. Elgazzar is a brilliant researcher”
“This is a fight between two distinguished academics and the University at which they have tenure over a Pig Model….”
A whistleblower tried to report fraud in Domenico Pratico’s papers via proper channels, and hit a wall everywhere.
“I am highly admired by my colleagues for the high level of rigor and reproducibility I continue to apply to research. ” Dr David Danielpour
A tale of brave academic editors fighting those bad, naughty, annoying anonymous whistleblower trolls
“Wrong again Do you have a problem?” – Bob Bloch
From Lesné’s public shame to successful role models of neuroscience like Aguzzi and Tessier-Lavigne.
Have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.









