In Spain, there seems to be a tradition of reacting to emerging evidence of data manipulation with handing out prestigious awards to authors of these papers. This is how we were all taught that all the PubPeer evidence matters nothing whatsoever, as Pura Munoz-Canoves, Maria Pia Cosma and Manel Esteller were celebrated with prizes and grants for their research achievements (read here , here and here).  Now there is a new popular academic hero in Spain, Carlos López-Otín, Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at the University of Oviedo, and EMBO member. Lopez-Otin was now awarded a 2017 Mentoring Award,  presented to him by Sir Philip Campbell, on behalf of his journal Nature, which Editor-in-Chief Sir Philip has been for the last 22 years.

The journal Nature remains the highest authority in science, this Mentoring Award is Sir Philip’s parting present to the Nature-reading scientific community, as he is being promoted inside Springer Nature’s publishing hierarchy. It is in this way a statement of what Nature and its publisher think of research integrity. Lopez-Otin’s evidence record on PubPeer is telling enough, however most of the evidence of digitally manipulated gel images there was posted around 2-3 months ago, by the pseudonymous Claire Francis. Maybe the evidence appeared too late, and the award decision couldn’t be stopped anymore. Which would explain why Nature deleted their own tweet announcing the mentorship awards after I replied to it with PubPeer evidence on Lopez-Otin’s papers. According to another Nature website, which was for some reason also deleted, the closing date for nominations was Monday 31 July 2017. So I share some examples below, all are from papers where Lopez-Otin is last and corresponding author.

image-1506331676940
PubPeer evidence for Velasco et al Cancer Research 2000 and Velasco et al JBC 2002. It is obvious controls were run on separate gels, the-reused, and inappropriately inverted. Boxes highlight suspiciously similar areas of the background.

Nature tweeted the article about mentorship awards in Spain, to which I replied. Unlike with other social media, you cannot remove replies to your tweets if you disagree with those. Pop, the original Nature tweet was deleted, Nature followers on Twitter were then spared reading this filth:

The Nature site which invited award nomination from Spain, was gone as well. This was the awarding committee, according to residues that site left Google search and this source:

Chair of the judges: Josep Penuelas, Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF) – National Research Council (CSIC), Barcelona

Judging panel:
Alison Abbott, Nature, Munich, Germany
Emilia R. Solano, CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain
Juan Lerma, Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante – UMH, Alicante, Spain
Mariano Barbacid, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas, Madrid, Spain
Pilar Ruiz Lapuente, Institute of Cosmos Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

image-1506685431120
PubPeer evidence for suspected gel band duplication (highlighted with colour boxes)  in Mariño et al, JBC 2007

For some reason, jury member Alison Abbot failed to mention her decisive role in her follow-up Nature article, while the past one listing her as member of the judging panel was deleted.

screenshot-www.google.de-2017-12-19-12-23-40
All which is left of the deleted Nature site, a Google search blurb

When issuing the award, Sir Philip said about Lopez-Otin:

Spain’s great examples are no exception – they are extraordinary in their ability to nurture emerging scientists of great diversity.”

Extraordinary re-use of a loading control indeed, in this paper from Lopez-Otin lab:

image-1506619193651
PubPeer evidence for Jiménez et al, JCB 2001. Not only does the loading control appear to be re-used for different experiments, the first band on that gel is clearly different,

Alison Abbot, who was one of the judges, later wrote in this Nature article:

“López-Otín’s mentees praised his ability to draw out and encourage even the shyest lab member. “Carlos gave me the strength to pursue an independent career as a principal investigator,” one wrote. “He made me feel that my career was a priority for him, and it is thanks to him that my career has advanced further than I would ever have imagined.” Another noted how López-Otín had encouraged trainees to read widely and think big. “Carlos told me that ground-breaking work comes from broad scientific knowledge, while overspecialization is the path to small science.”

Nominators said that López-Otín insisted on celebrating every accepted paper or project in the lab and was widely generous with advice”.

One wonders, how was this copy-pasting on the background, apparently required in order to get this paper accepted, celebrated?

image-1506419828955
PubPeer evidence for Llano et al, JBC 2008. This figure is most obviously crudely manipulated, with duplicated parts of background. The image is not even contrast-enhanced, only boxes and arrows added to highlight manipulations.

Another quote from the Nature article by Alison Abbot:

“Carlos has been a constant catalyst of scientific activities in Asturias, a region marked by decades of economic and social distress,” wrote one of his mentees”.

In this vein, was prompting people to clone gel bands part of those catalytic activities of the mentorship award-winner Lopez-Otin?

image-1506683267923
PubPeer evidence for Díaz-Perales et al JBC 2005. heavy lane splicing aside, one lane in GAPD seems to feature three times on the same gel.

Even Sir Philip’s own Nature family wasn’t spared of Lopez-Otis irregularities. This PubPeer post discusses Soria-Valles et al, Nature Cell Biology, 2015, and how the provided original blot images in the supplementary data do not match their published figure counterparts.

 


 

Donate!

If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. Or several of small tips, just increase the amount as you like. Your generous patronage of my journalism, however small it appears to you, will greatly help me with my legal costs.

€5,00

21 thoughts on “Nature rewards data manipulation with a Mentoring Award

  1. For sure artistic creativity must be compensated….indeed a good part of a PhD in Spain is dedicated how to do the best Adobe Photoshop artistic jobs….

    Like

    1. Well Ana,

      Sounds like you speak from experience, as, to the best of my knowldege, you are supporting such an UNTRUE statement by no evidence appart from your own PhD (and perhaps someone else’s in your environment?) in Spain.
      Bottom line: you are just fabricating the data on which you based your conclusions. Therefore, in the light of your affirmation, I could probably say that you did a great PhD in Spain, right?. Good for you then!!

      Like

      1. Dear Manuel
        Indeed I did a great, fair and clean PhD in Spain and I am truly thankful to a couple of Spanish who helped me in their painful crusade against their own system
        Everybody knows about how the system works in Spain and most of the academics are afraid of talking fearing represalies
        In Portugal the system is similar, fortunately we have an research fellows association who intends to defend their rights, ABIC with many difficulties

        Like

      2. Dear Ana,
        I cannot do other thing that support Manuel and feel sorry for the pathetic environment you had on your PhD, mine, also in Spain, was full of amazing scientists, that were able to publish in very good journal with much less support than other countries. I learnt very good science, how to be a good scientist, and testimony of that is the good job I am doing outside Spain. I’m super proud, and it was here in UK the first time I faced lies in science and had to live with it. You are an arrogant and an ignorant by thinking that you were the only honest scientist in Spain or one of the “few”…keep doing that thinking you are the best, that kind of humility and respect to others is exactly what a good scientist should be…

        Like

  2. You have to congratulate Nature on bringing the data manipulation to public attention.
    Nature may be unwitting, but it does have high impact.

    Like

      1. Dear Isabel,

        I am still waiting you to name 20 “amazing scientists” in Spain.
        It should not be difficult as you wrote that “Spain, was full of amazing scientists”.
        If you cannot name 20 where have they gone?

        Like

      2. I hope we could end this debate by agreeing there are in fact quite a lot of very good scientists in Spain, but under current conditions they must live in fear of their dishonest peers who accumulate power, grants and awards. An award given to these cheaters is not just a meaningless cup or a medal. It is a sign who enjoys protection from the very top. Spain as a former oppressive dictatorship surely knows how this works.

        Like

  3. Antonio Garcia de Herreros.
    https://www.imim.cat/programesrecerca/cancer/en_ubcm.html

    https://pubpeer.com/publications/BDEB1BEC0F27AC6D5AFDD0D0E980F7
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/D9AB005FB5B07483BC12C2C0DFB454
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/5A785B0CF23403E24C25D3C43111FB
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/981BDA5DB6DFD80DCC41AEF1808BE9
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/BEB69B48326037191631A1B13D607C
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/4166CB88F57104A834DDEF71515EEC
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/A8F3E69DACCF638411E66257F47A9F
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/447EC5BFD11D3D1D947100DAB271F9
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/2EB431B880F997FBCDB5A4E48927FD
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/034CC3FA793059AD615B5A5D80BD84
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/95D7EDC45C43706AB46E45AE03F1A1
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/7A2D9BBDCE85623CB4824CA04077E0
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/07643B5654697153BE6504D2C3F966
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/2F0AF28466D2E1D31510ACC72794F1
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/8A9B324060E1673639C5114CC0F3C5
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/77ACF5E0CB3F2BB5DEAF2019B0CCE3
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/C82AD606E1FE4DE152DA1D1796DE7B
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/AE72300768ECE0EA987B4842EB30CA
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E155718533A0156BBEAD8E8D59A0C
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/0A32B29DEA2D2B0A10F4F362F55CD4
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/E2D2996937DCDDAF9559725FDFDC95
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E99B1B3B43B7D6917347AAA23EE7B
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/42E81CC060E1BEA09DB2F7AAC9E484
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/A62C2A767B8A9A60229DD116BCBB0D
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/03C59A9C6383C9E70C9EEA7E056336
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/DD8A003880FB4B4E2CE5218FD971D8
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/7B8A5F590BF1468283CC3FE7D6BBCA
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/E3471375942FBF3B5CBA8C3AC0C551
    https://pubpeer.com/publications/7D64B99471B2AE86604500FC8D6569

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s