Below a support letter by Rafael Cantera, professor of zoology at the University of Stockholm in Sweden, addressed to the leadership of the University Clinic Würzburg. This is because two professors of this German university, Thorsten Walles and Heike Mertsching (now Walles) chose to respond to my inquiries about their earlier trachea transplants made from pig intestine (see my detailed report here) with lawyers’ financial blackmail and right after, with court actions, which had me sentenced guilty with a threat of a prison term of 6 months, without my prior knowledge (see case description here). Such are the peculiarities of German law: internet bloggers are basically legally defined here by default as criminals, and professors as infallible and divine beings (in fact, even Walleses’ former boss and collaborator Paolo Macchiarini is still a protected adjunct professor at their former common place of work, the Medical University Hannover). I received lots of support from my readers, and was also invited to give an interview with the French magazine Mediapart (German version here). Now, I am deeply grateful to Prof. Cantera for his support, and hope other international and maybe even German academics join in and sign below.

A conspiracy of German institutions against freedom of information
The Walleses even admitted to their judge in Würzburg that they did receive my questions in advance, but chose not to reply to them. They instead even revealed to the court their immediate intentions to find out my private address and had me slapped with a costly court injunction and a threat of a prison term, from the very beginning. The judge however apparently saw my act of asking inconvenient questions alone as an act of blasphemy against German professors. The only evidence against me which this Würzburg regional court judge actually bothered to scrutinise was the Walleses’ academic employment situation and their current applications to new professorships. That “evidence” fully sufficed to declare me guilty of slanderous libel against two German professors, what I actually wrote about their trachea transplants on my site was utterly irrelevant in this context. It was enough that the Walleses did not like it.
While they and their pricey lawyer prepared this legal attack on basic freedoms of speech and press, their employers, the University of Würzburg and the Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology in Stuttgart, repeatedly refused to answer any of my questions regarding those 3 tracheal transplants, even when requested to do so under legally binding freedom of information law. Most recently, I asked the Fraunhofer institute to explain if any animal testing at all was performed before their researcher Heike Walles delivered in 2007 and 2009 pig-intestine-derived tracheal grafts which her husband then implanted into two patients. The internet biomedical portal PubMed suggests that to the very least, no animal experiments at all were published by the Walleses in this regard, before or after the method was initially first tested on a human patient together with Macchiarini in Hannover in 2004.
Update 23.01.2017: The Fraunhofer Institute admitted that no animal testing was deemed necessary prior to two patient transplants. Details here.
Instead answering my questions, the University Clinic of Würzburg allowed their two professors to use these affiliations to suggest that they were actually acting in court against me as representatives of the entire University Clinic. It went as far that both the University and the University Clinic Würzburg refused to even acknowledge receiving my administrative complaints about their two professors, never mind processing those. My freedom of information inquiries to the German Ministry of Education and Research and the medicinal product watchdog Paul-Ehrlich-Institut about the Walles’ ministry-funded clinical trial and about the approvals for their previous trachea transplants, are as yet unanswered, even after the legally binding time period of one month to deliver a reply has long expired. It is none of nosy public’s business if human experiments in German research institutions (with none of the affected patients being currently alive) were ever properly approved or, if indeed these experiments actually still take place or are being prepared. The status of the aforementioned federally-funded multi-patient clinical trial with pig intestine-made trachea is confidential and not for us to know. If you want to speak of academic conspiracy in Germany, here is a big and a highly unsavoury one.
In fact, the Walles’ lawyer just sent me another threatening letter, demanding of me to accept the court injunction, pay his clients an unspecified compensation damage and him around €1800 lawyer’s fee.

Open Letter in support of Schneider’s investigation of trachea transplants in Germany, by Rafael Cantera
Prof. Dr. med. Georg Ertl, Medical Director University Clinic Würzburg, Germany.
Prof. Dr. med. Matthias Frosch, Dean of Medical Faculty, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
c/c Leonid Schneider
January 15, 2017
Dear colleagues,
For months I’ve been reading in the Swedish press as well as on Leonid Schneider’s blog For Better Science many notes about the scandalous trachea transplantations on human patients in which Dr. Paolo Macchiarini has been involved and for which he’s been, and is still investigated in Sweden. This was an extraordinary scandal for the Karolinska Institute and the Karolinska University Hospital; it has already resulted in several resignations and investigations, including a police investigation of Macchiarini himself. Fortunately, the Swedish authorities and academy adopted an open, self-critical and transparent reaction and in due process questions from journalists were answered, documents were made public, investigations were initiated and conclusions were reported to the public. For his fantastic journalistic investigation of this story “of fraudulent research” that “revealed life-threatening ambition in the academic world” the Swedish journalist Bo Lindquist was awarded the Swedish Grand Prize for Journalism in 2016.
In spite of that, according to the Swedish press and academic colleagues of mine in Sweden and other countries this scandal might have negative, perhaps long-lasting consequences on the public trust and confidence in science and medicine and so, in my opinion, it deserves to be investigated to the last link and detail. If the public trust is to be restored, every trachea transplantation in which Macchiarini and his collaborators were directly or indirectly involved should be investigated and the results must be clearly and openly reported to the public. In doing so, which as a scientist I think is necessary and important, Leonid Schneider started to investigate the activities of the German professors Heike and Thorsten Walles, who were also involved in trachea transplantations and had professional links to Macchiarini and his activities (primarily: Macchiarini et al 2004 and Walles et al, 2004).
Now, after reading about the court trial in Bavaria against Leonid Schneider, I have the unpleasant feeling that it is perhaps the intent to punish him for his investigations and to avoid further investigations of possible misconduct in German universities regarding Macchiarini-related trachea transplantations. This feeling will be supported if it was correct, I as was told, that both research institutions involved, namely the Fraunhofer Society and the University of Würzburg refused to answer questions regarding the two experimental trachea transplants on human patients they performed and later on published (Mertsching et al 2009 and Steinke et al, 2015 ). Moreover, it appears that Professors Walles acted apparently with full approval of their academic employer by using their academic affiliations with the University Clinic Würzburg. The outcome was a court injunction passed in absentia against Leonid Schneider forbidding him to state facts which Professors Walles themselves had been repeating often and widely just some years ago in interviews, press releases, books and research publications.
Leonid Schneider can count with my support and I hope you will also help him in his important investigation, answering his questions and providing as much information as you can disclose.
Yours sincerely,
Rafael Cantera, PhD
Professor
Zoology Institute, Stockholm University
Stockholm, Sweden
Dear readers, If you wish to express your support as well, please comment with your full name and institutional affiliation below.
If you would like to support my court litigation financially, donation amount doesn’t matter, please go to my Patreon site or contact me.

Donate!
If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. Or several of small tips, just increase the amount as you like (2x=€10; 5x=€25). Your generous patronage of my journalism will be most appreciated!
€5.00
Update 4.02.2017. The signatories of this letter have been subjected to an “alternative facts” campaign by Walles’ employee Jan Hansmann. Details here.


I fully support the contents of Prof. Cantera’s letter. Transparency in dealing with ethical issues in academic institutions will bring better science.
Annalisa Berzigotti, MD, PhD
Associate Professor
Hepatology, UVCM
University of Bern
Switzerland
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Evidence is a lie, listen to our authority, say Walles to scientists – For Better Science
I support this letter. When science is decided by the courts, we’re all in big trouble, even in a democracy.
Nicholas Brown, MSc
PhD candidate
University of Groningen
Netherlands
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support this open letter and the work of LS on behalf of science, public health, and freedom of speech. It should be shocking that the scientific establishment is acting like the enemy of free speech and effective journalism.
Lydia M. Maniatis, PhD
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support this letter. Honest bloggers contribute much more to science than dishonest scientists.
Neuroskeptic,
UK neuroscientist and science blogger (Discover Magazine)
http://discovermagazine.com/authors?name=Neuroskeptic
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support the open letter.
This quote from the eminent Pet Shop Boys sums it all:
“If you’ve done nothing wrong
You’ve got nothing to fear
If you’ve something to hide
You shouldn’t even be here”
Dr Guillaume Rousselet – Senior Lecturer
Institute of Neuroscience & Psychology
University of Glasgow
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that all work done with participation of Macchiarini must be carefully investigated. I am impressed by the multiple investigations on all possible levels which took place in Sweden and surprized that German Universities have not made adequate effort to investigate Macchiarini’s work, work of his co-authors, all relevant operations made using similar methods. It looks like Leonid is doing this job instead of Universities and other official organizations in Germany. I am not specialist in this field but I strongly support efforts of Leonid who is trying to investigate this story. I support the letter by Prof. Cantera’s letter.
Dr. Alexandr Talyzin
Umeå University, Sweden
LikeLike
I too fully support Professor Cantera’s letter.
Didier Barradas Bautista, PhD candidate, Protein Interactions and Docking
Life Sciences Department, Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Barcelona, Spain.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support Leonid’s investigations and Cantera’s letter!
Alexey Bersenev,
Yale University
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support Prof. Cantera’s letter. There needs to be transparency when it comes to ethical issues and you cannot just sweep the truth under the carpet. Punishing journalists who repeat open statements seems therefore totally inappropriate.
Prof Dr Melanie Blokesch,
EPFL SV GHI UPBLO
SV 3529 (Bâtiment SV)
Station 19
CH-1015 Lausanne
Switzerland
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully support Professor Cantera’s letter.
Prof Dr Paulo Sergio R. Coelho
University of São Paulo
Ribeirão Preto – SP
Brazil
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support this letter.
Dr Steven M. Pollard
Cancer Research UK Senior Research Fellow
MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine
SCRM Building
The University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh bioQuarter
5 Little France Drive
Edinburgh
UK
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Image duplication and other irregularities of Heike and Thorsten Walles – For Better Science
I fully support this open letter, and am frankly amazed that the German Courts have taken the approach they have done.
Professor Charles Oppenheim, BSc, PhD, DSc, Hon FCLIP, FRSA
Visiting Professor at City University, London, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen and at The University of Northampton
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully support Professor Cantera’s letter.
Marco Trujillo
Research Group Leader
Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry
Germany
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hei Leonid,
I am astonished by this kind of image manipulations in publications.. There should very tough consequences, or else the integrity of research will under question.
Keep up the fight
Dr. Prajwal
Zürich
LikeLiked by 1 person
“STAP” has sapped the fight out of me for science integrity. But here, I make the extra effort to strongly support Leonid’s investigation into Paola Macchiarini trachea transplantation misdeeds. I also strongly support Professor Cantera’s open letter.
Professor Kenneth Lee
Chief of Developmental and Regenerative Biology
School of Biomedical Sciences
Chinese University of Hong Kong
LikeLiked by 1 person
I strongly support Professor Cantera’s open letter.
Nikolai Adamski, PhD
John Inne Centre, Norwich, UK
LikeLiked by 1 person
While I recognize that I am not familiar with the German legal system, I feel that Schneider’s investigation on this issue has ended up in an unbalanced court decision. I may not share all Schneider’s opinions on other matters, but I support Prof. Cantera’s letter in relation to Schneider’s investigation.
Prof. Dr. Crisanto Gutierrez
Centro de Biologia Molecular Severo Ochoa
Madrid, Spain
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many thanks to Leonid Schneider for his work. I fully support Rafael Cantera’s open letter.
Prof. Dr. Burkhard Morgenstern
University of Göttingen
LikeLiked by 1 person