Lawyering-up Medicine Open Letter

Open Letter in support of my investigation of trachea transplants in Germany, by Rafael Cantera

Below a support letter by Rafael Cantera, professor of zoology at the University of Stockholm in Sweden, addressed to the leadership of the University Clinic Würzburg. This is because two professors of this German university, Thorsten Walles and Heike Mertsching (now Walles) chose to respond to my inquiries about their earlier trachea transplants made from pig intestine (see my detailed report here) with lawyers’ financial blackmail and right after, with court actions, which had me sentenced guilty with a  threat of a prison term of 6 months, without my prior knowledge (see case description here). Such are the peculiarities of German law: internet bloggers are basically  legally defined here by default as criminals, and professors as infallible and divine beings (in fact, even Walleses’ former boss and collaborator Paolo Macchiarini is still a protected adjunct professor at their former common place of work, the Medical University Hannover). I received lots of support from my readers, and was also invited to give an interview with the French magazine Mediapart (German version here). Now, I am deeply grateful to Prof. Cantera for his support, and hope other international and maybe even German academics join in and sign below. 

rcantera_about
Rafael Cantera, author of Open Letter below (source: Stockholm University)

A conspiracy of German institutions against freedom of information

The Walleses even admitted to their judge in Würzburg that they did receive my questions in advance, but chose not to reply to them. They instead even revealed to the court their immediate intentions to find out my private address and had me slapped with a costly court injunction and a threat of a prison term, from the very beginning. The judge however apparently saw my act of asking inconvenient questions alone as an act of blasphemy against German professors.  The only  evidence against me which this Würzburg regional court judge actually bothered to scrutinise was the Walleses’ academic employment situation and their current applications to new professorships. That “evidence” fully sufficed to declare me guilty of slanderous libel against two German professors, what I actually wrote about their trachea transplants on my site was utterly irrelevant in this context. It was enough that the Walleses did not like it.

While they and their pricey lawyer prepared this legal attack on basic freedoms of speech and press, their employers, the University of Würzburg and the Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology in Stuttgart, repeatedly refused to answer any of my questions regarding those 3 tracheal transplants, even when requested to do so under legally binding freedom of information law. Most recently, I asked the Fraunhofer institute to explain if any animal testing at all was performed before their researcher Heike Walles delivered in 2007 and 2009 pig-intestine-derived tracheal grafts which her husband then implanted into two patients. The internet biomedical portal PubMed suggests that to the very least, no animal experiments at all were published by the Walleses in this regard, before or after the method was initially first tested on a human patient together with Macchiarini in Hannover in 2004.

Update 23.01.2017: The Fraunhofer Institute admitted that no animal testing was deemed necessary prior to two patient transplants. Details here.

Instead answering my questions, the University Clinic of Würzburg allowed their two professors to use these affiliations to suggest that they were actually acting in court against me as representatives of the entire University Clinic. It went as far that both the University and the University Clinic Würzburg refused to even acknowledge receiving my administrative complaints about their two professors, never mind processing those. My freedom of information inquiries to the German Ministry of Education and Research and the medicinal product watchdog Paul-Ehrlich-Institut about the Walles’ ministry-funded clinical trial and about the approvals for their previous trachea transplants, are as yet unanswered, even after the legally binding time period of one month to deliver a reply has long expired. It is none of nosy public’s business if human experiments in German research institutions (with none of the affected patients being currently alive) were ever properly approved  or, if indeed these experiments actually still take place or are being prepared. The status of the aforementioned federally-funded multi-patient clinical trial with pig intestine-made trachea is confidential and not for us to know. If you want to speak of academic conspiracy in Germany, here is a big and a highly unsavoury one.

In fact, the Walles’ lawyer just sent me another threatening letter, demanding of me to accept the court injunction, pay his clients an unspecified compensation damage and him around €1800 lawyer’s fee.

csm_thorsten_und_heike_walles_a2f15ad681
Don’t you dare ask questions about their trachea transplants, or you’ll go to prison. These are two German professors and the law is on their side. Thorsten and Heike Walles, image source: University of Würzburg.

Open Letter in support of Schneider’s investigation of trachea transplants in Germany, by Rafael Cantera

Prof. Dr. med. Georg Ertl, Medical Director University Clinic Würzburg, Germany.

Prof. Dr. med. Matthias Frosch, Dean of Medical Faculty, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

c/c Leonid Schneider

January 15, 2017

Dear colleagues,

For months I’ve been reading in the Swedish press as well as on Leonid Schneider’s blog For Better Science many notes about the scandalous trachea transplantations on human patients in which Dr. Paolo Macchiarini has been involved and for which he’s been, and is still investigated in Sweden. This was an extraordinary scandal for the Karolinska Institute and the Karolinska University Hospital; it has already resulted in several resignations and investigations, including a police investigation of Macchiarini himself. Fortunately, the Swedish authorities and academy adopted an open, self-critical and transparent reaction and in due process questions from journalists were answered, documents were made public, investigations were initiated and conclusions were reported to the public. For his fantastic journalistic investigation of this story  “of fraudulent research” that “revealed life-threatening ambition in the academic world” the Swedish journalist Bo Lindquist was awarded the Swedish Grand Prize for Journalism in 2016.

In spite of that, according to the Swedish press and academic colleagues of mine in Sweden and other countries this scandal might have negative, perhaps long-lasting consequences on the public trust and confidence in science and medicine and so, in my opinion, it deserves to be investigated to the last link and detail. If the public trust is to be restored, every trachea transplantation in which Macchiarini and his collaborators were directly or indirectly involved should be investigated and the results must be clearly and openly reported to the public. In doing so, which as a scientist I think is necessary and important, Leonid Schneider started to investigate the activities of the German professors Heike and Thorsten Walles, who were also involved in trachea transplantations and had professional links to Macchiarini and his activities (primarily: Macchiarini et al 2004 and Walles et al, 2004).

Now, after reading about the court trial in Bavaria against Leonid Schneider, I have the unpleasant feeling that it is perhaps the intent to punish him for his investigations and to avoid further investigations of possible misconduct in German universities regarding Macchiarini-related trachea transplantations. This feeling will be supported if it was correct, I as was told, that both research institutions involved, namely the Fraunhofer Society and the University of Würzburg refused to answer questions regarding the two experimental trachea transplants on human patients they performed and later on published (Mertsching et al 2009  and Steinke et al, 2015 ). Moreover, it appears that Professors Walles acted apparently with full approval of their academic employer by using their academic affiliations with the University Clinic Würzburg. The outcome was a court injunction passed in absentia against Leonid Schneider forbidding him to state facts which Professors Walles themselves had been repeating often and widely just some years ago in interviews, press releases, books and research publications.

Leonid Schneider can count with my support and I hope you will also help him in his important investigation, answering his questions and providing as much information as you can disclose.

Yours sincerely,

Rafael Cantera, PhD

Professor

Zoology Institute, Stockholm University

Stockholm, Sweden


Dear readers, If you wish to express your support as well, please comment with your full name and institutional affiliation below.

If you would like to support my court litigation financially, donation amount doesn’t matter, please go to my Patreon site or contact me

Donate!

If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. Or several of small tips, just increase the amount as you like (2x=€10; 5x=€25). Your generous patronage of my journalism will be most appreciated!

€5.00


Update 4.02.2017. The signatories of this letter have been subjected to an “alternative facts” campaign by Walles’ employee Jan Hansmann. Details here.

228 comments on “Open Letter in support of my investigation of trachea transplants in Germany, by Rafael Cantera

  1. Christian Scheckhuber's avatar
    Christian Scheckhuber

    Support from my side for brave Leonid and his work!

    Dr. Christian Q. Scheckhuber
    Principal investigator
    CINVESTAV Monterrey
    Vía del Conocimiento 201
    Parque de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica
    Código Postal 66600
    Apodaca NL
    Mexico

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Archana's avatar

    I fully support Leonid’s work and the open letter.
    Archana Varadaraj, PhD
    Assistant Professor,
    Northern Arizona University, Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry
    USA

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Stefano Zapperi's avatar

    I support the letter and thank Leonid for his work on scientific misconduct.

    Prof. Stefano Zapperi
    Center for Complexity and Biosystems,
    University of Milan

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Caterina La Porta's avatar

    I support Cantera’s letter. Thanks to Leonid for his great work to keep an eye on misconduct in science.

    Prof. Caterina La Porta
    Center for Complexity and Biosystems,
    University of Milan

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Giulia Liberati (@70Hertz)'s avatar

    Please count me in.

    Giulia Liberati
    Université Catholique de Louvain
    Belgium

    Liked by 1 person

  6. azecevic's avatar

    You have my support.

    Alma Zecevic Faust Ph.D.
    Administrative Director, Research Program
    UT MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Like

  7. Benedikt Berninger's avatar
    Benedikt Berninger

    I sign in support of Leonid Schneider.
    Prof. Dr. Benedikt Berninger
    University Medical Center 
    Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Gregor Kalinkat's avatar

    I support this open letter & Leonid’s outstanding investigative work which is clearly needed to be continued.

    Dr. Gregor Kalinkat
    Postdoc
    Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology & Inland Fisheries Berlin
    Germany

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Stefano Amalfitano's avatar
    Stefano Amalfitano

    I stay with Professor Cantera in support of Leonid Schneider. Count on me!

    Stefano Amalfitano, PhD
    IRSA-CNR
    Italy

    Like

  10. SVS Meldpunt klachten siliconen's avatar

    I support this open letter and Leonid Schneiders work. We as patiënts need more critical academics who stand up for better science and integrity.
    Marga van Amersfoort,
    President SVS (non profit organization for >4700 women who got sick due to silicone breast implants)
    Netherlands

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Kasper van Gelderen's avatar
    Kasper van Gelderen

    Although court injunctions are a lawful instrument, I think that they can be misused too easily. In this case they certainly have been and it is used to harass someone practices internet journalism. Apparently they feel threatened by this, which is surprising, since the two people, the Walleses, are in a position of much greater power than a journalist reporting on scientific misconduct. I thus think this is a blatant misuse of power and should stop
    Kasper van Gelderen,
    Post-Doc,
    Utrecht University

    Liked by 1 person

  12. alberto.baccini's avatar

    I support this letter. Leonid Scheider is doing a great job for research integrity.

    Prof. Alberto Baccini
    University of Siena
    Italy

    Like

  13. Benoît Girard's avatar
    Benoît Girard

    I also support this letter.

    Dr. Benoît Girard
    Research Director
    CNRS
    France

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Michal Cifra's avatar
    Michal Cifra

    I support this open letter.

    Michal Cifra
    Head of research team
    Czech Academy of Sciences

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Haakon Engen's avatar
    Haakon Engen

    I fully support this letter.

    Haakon Engen
    Postdoctoral Fellow
    Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
    Leipzig, Germany

    Liked by 1 person

  16. William Barendse's avatar
    William Barendse

    I support the freedom of the press and open science

    William Barendse
    Honorary Professor
    School of Veterinary Science
    University of Queensland
    Australia

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Stefano Giaimo's avatar
    Stefano Giaimo

    I fully support the open letter of professor Cantera.

    Stefano Giaimo
    postdoc at MPI for Evolutionary Biology
    Plön, Germany

    Like

  18. Mauro Sylos-Labini's avatar

    I support the open letter and the important work by Leonid for integrity in science.
    Mauro Sylos Labini
    Associate professor of Economic Policy
    Department of Political Science – University of Pisa, Italy

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Pingback: Würzburg misconduct Commission acquits Walles, dismisses biased medical expert, restarts anew as data manipulations flood in – For Better Science

  20. Leigh Turner's avatar

    I wish to add my name to Professor Rafael Cantera’s letter in support of Leonid Schneider’s investigative reporting concerning trachea transplants conducted in Germany and elsewhere. These experimental procedures — and the many ethical, legal, and scientific issues they raise — need to be subjected to careful and critical scrutiny and public debate. Silencing or attempting to silence investigators and critics does not serve the public interest.

    I am an Associate Professor at the University of Minnesota. I write as an individual faculty member and not on behalf of my academic institution.

    Yours sincerely,

    Leigh Turner, Ph.D.
    Associate Professor
    University of Minnesota Center for Bioethics

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to SVS Meldpunt klachten siliconen Cancel reply