Editors vs the Anonymous
A tale of brave academic editors fighting those bad, naughty, annoying anonymous whistleblower trolls
By Leonid Schneider, on research integrity, biomedical ethics and academic publishing
A tale of brave academic editors fighting those bad, naughty, annoying anonymous whistleblower trolls
“Wrong again Do you have a problem?” – Bob Bloch
From Lesné’s public shame to successful role models of neuroscience like Aguzzi and Tessier-Lavigne.
“If in any case we consider that the problems with the images really affected the validity of the results, we ourselves would ask the corresponding journal to retract the article.” – Prof Javier González-Gallego
Smut Clyde chases free radicals in a German-run lab in China
Yo, what’s up, my homies, Shaker Mousa is in da house.
Peter Jordan is exactly the kind of scientist Portugal needs.
“‘More than 80 articles and H-index over 25 (Scopus) have been achieved’.” – M.K. Ahmed
Lorenza Colzato was a rising star of psychology and a role model for Women in STEM. All Dutch media and even some local German newspapers talk about her now. But I want to talk about her husband Bernhard Hommel instead.
“I feel that these continuous comments(s) may be pushing the boundaries, which should also be a concern for PubPeer.” – Dr Richard Vierstra









