Below a support letter by Rafael Cantera, professor of zoology at the University of Stockholm in Sweden, addressed to the leadership of the University Clinic Würzburg. This is because two professors of this German university, Thorsten Walles and Heike Mertsching (now Walles) chose to respond to my inquiries about their earlier trachea transplants made from pig intestine (see my detailed report here) with lawyers’ financial blackmail and right after, with court actions, which had me sentenced guilty with a threat of a prison term of 6 months, without my prior knowledge (see case description here). Such are the peculiarities of German law: internet bloggers are basically legally defined here by default as criminals, and professors as infallible and divine beings (in fact, even Walleses’ former boss and collaborator Paolo Macchiarini is still a protected adjunct professor at their former common place of work, the Medical University Hannover). I received lots of support from my readers, and was also invited to give an interview with the French magazine Mediapart (German version here). Now, I am deeply grateful to Prof. Cantera for his support, and hope other international and maybe even German academics join in and sign below.

A conspiracy of German institutions against freedom of information
The Walleses even admitted to their judge in Würzburg that they did receive my questions in advance, but chose not to reply to them. They instead even revealed to the court their immediate intentions to find out my private address and had me slapped with a costly court injunction and a threat of a prison term, from the very beginning. The judge however apparently saw my act of asking inconvenient questions alone as an act of blasphemy against German professors. The only evidence against me which this Würzburg regional court judge actually bothered to scrutinise was the Walleses’ academic employment situation and their current applications to new professorships. That “evidence” fully sufficed to declare me guilty of slanderous libel against two German professors, what I actually wrote about their trachea transplants on my site was utterly irrelevant in this context. It was enough that the Walleses did not like it.
While they and their pricey lawyer prepared this legal attack on basic freedoms of speech and press, their employers, the University of Würzburg and the Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology in Stuttgart, repeatedly refused to answer any of my questions regarding those 3 tracheal transplants, even when requested to do so under legally binding freedom of information law. Most recently, I asked the Fraunhofer institute to explain if any animal testing at all was performed before their researcher Heike Walles delivered in 2007 and 2009 pig-intestine-derived tracheal grafts which her husband then implanted into two patients. The internet biomedical portal PubMed suggests that to the very least, no animal experiments at all were published by the Walleses in this regard, before or after the method was initially first tested on a human patient together with Macchiarini in Hannover in 2004.
Update 23.01.2017: The Fraunhofer Institute admitted that no animal testing was deemed necessary prior to two patient transplants. Details here.
Instead answering my questions, the University Clinic of Würzburg allowed their two professors to use these affiliations to suggest that they were actually acting in court against me as representatives of the entire University Clinic. It went as far that both the University and the University Clinic Würzburg refused to even acknowledge receiving my administrative complaints about their two professors, never mind processing those. My freedom of information inquiries to the German Ministry of Education and Research and the medicinal product watchdog Paul-Ehrlich-Institut about the Walles’ ministry-funded clinical trial and about the approvals for their previous trachea transplants, are as yet unanswered, even after the legally binding time period of one month to deliver a reply has long expired. It is none of nosy public’s business if human experiments in German research institutions (with none of the affected patients being currently alive) were ever properly approved or, if indeed these experiments actually still take place or are being prepared. The status of the aforementioned federally-funded multi-patient clinical trial with pig intestine-made trachea is confidential and not for us to know. If you want to speak of academic conspiracy in Germany, here is a big and a highly unsavoury one.
In fact, the Walles’ lawyer just sent me another threatening letter, demanding of me to accept the court injunction, pay his clients an unspecified compensation damage and him around €1800 lawyer’s fee.

Open Letter in support of Schneider’s investigation of trachea transplants in Germany, by Rafael Cantera
Prof. Dr. med. Georg Ertl, Medical Director University Clinic Würzburg, Germany.
Prof. Dr. med. Matthias Frosch, Dean of Medical Faculty, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
c/c Leonid Schneider
January 15, 2017
Dear colleagues,
For months I’ve been reading in the Swedish press as well as on Leonid Schneider’s blog For Better Science many notes about the scandalous trachea transplantations on human patients in which Dr. Paolo Macchiarini has been involved and for which he’s been, and is still investigated in Sweden. This was an extraordinary scandal for the Karolinska Institute and the Karolinska University Hospital; it has already resulted in several resignations and investigations, including a police investigation of Macchiarini himself. Fortunately, the Swedish authorities and academy adopted an open, self-critical and transparent reaction and in due process questions from journalists were answered, documents were made public, investigations were initiated and conclusions were reported to the public. For his fantastic journalistic investigation of this story “of fraudulent research” that “revealed life-threatening ambition in the academic world” the Swedish journalist Bo Lindquist was awarded the Swedish Grand Prize for Journalism in 2016.
In spite of that, according to the Swedish press and academic colleagues of mine in Sweden and other countries this scandal might have negative, perhaps long-lasting consequences on the public trust and confidence in science and medicine and so, in my opinion, it deserves to be investigated to the last link and detail. If the public trust is to be restored, every trachea transplantation in which Macchiarini and his collaborators were directly or indirectly involved should be investigated and the results must be clearly and openly reported to the public. In doing so, which as a scientist I think is necessary and important, Leonid Schneider started to investigate the activities of the German professors Heike and Thorsten Walles, who were also involved in trachea transplantations and had professional links to Macchiarini and his activities (primarily: Macchiarini et al 2004 and Walles et al, 2004).
Now, after reading about the court trial in Bavaria against Leonid Schneider, I have the unpleasant feeling that it is perhaps the intent to punish him for his investigations and to avoid further investigations of possible misconduct in German universities regarding Macchiarini-related trachea transplantations. This feeling will be supported if it was correct, I as was told, that both research institutions involved, namely the Fraunhofer Society and the University of Würzburg refused to answer questions regarding the two experimental trachea transplants on human patients they performed and later on published (Mertsching et al 2009 and Steinke et al, 2015 ). Moreover, it appears that Professors Walles acted apparently with full approval of their academic employer by using their academic affiliations with the University Clinic Würzburg. The outcome was a court injunction passed in absentia against Leonid Schneider forbidding him to state facts which Professors Walles themselves had been repeating often and widely just some years ago in interviews, press releases, books and research publications.
Leonid Schneider can count with my support and I hope you will also help him in his important investigation, answering his questions and providing as much information as you can disclose.
Yours sincerely,
Rafael Cantera, PhD
Professor
Zoology Institute, Stockholm University
Stockholm, Sweden
Dear readers, If you wish to express your support as well, please comment with your full name and institutional affiliation below.
If you would like to support my court litigation financially, donation amount doesn’t matter, please go to my Patreon site or contact me.

Donate!
If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. Or several of small tips, just increase the amount as you like (2x=€10; 5x=€25). Your generous patronage of my journalism will be most appreciated!
€5.00
Update 4.02.2017. The signatories of this letter have been subjected to an “alternative facts” campaign by Walles’ employee Jan Hansmann. Details here.


I fully agree with the contents of the letter by Prof. Cantera and fully support the need of clarifications claimed by Leonid Schneider
Luigi Naselli-Flores, PhD
Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies
University of Palermo, Italy
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully support Professor Cantera’s letter in support of the important work that Leonid Schneider is doing to promote transparency and fairness in science.
Luciano Conti, PhD
Associate Professor
Centre for Integrative Biology – CIBIO
Università degli Studi di Trento
Via Sommarive 9, 38123 Povo (TN), ITALY
LikeLiked by 1 person
I stand with Professor Cantera in support of Leonid Schneider. The court action is scandalous and cowardly. For the interests of future patients and good science, the trachael transplantations concerned must be openly investigated.
Dr Tristram Wyatt
Kellogg College
University of Oxford, UK
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support open and transparent investigation and evaluation of research in any area, and in that spirit I support Leonid Schneider’s search for the facts in this case.
Shravan Vasishth
Professor of Linguistics,
University of Potsdam, Germany
LikeLiked by 1 person
Freedom of Speech, freedom of investigation, freedom of blogging, freedom of journalism should be protected -more so at such times when they are being threatened.
Bishal Gyawali
PhD scholar at Nagoya University, Japan.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Fine della lista di Beall – OggiScienza
I give Dr. Leonid Schneider my full support. For better science!
Kfir Lapid, PhD
UT southwestern medical center, Dallas, Texas
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully support the letter from prof. Cantera and I stand with Leonid Schneider, which painstakingly investigate misconduct in science.
Enrico Bucci, PhD
Adjunct Professor in Systems Biology
SHRO – Temple University
1900 N 12th St – 19122 Philadelphia, PA – US
LikeLiked by 1 person
Please, do, as it is very important issue for many institutions
Oleg Gusev
Unit Leader
KFU-RIKEN Translational Genomics Unit
Riken Innovation Center
Riken, Yokohama
Japan
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully support the opinion expressed by Rafael Cantera in the above letter.
Dr. Edgardo Sepulveda
MPI for Developmental Biology
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hereby support the open letter by Rafael Cantera.
Prof. Lars Juhl Jensen
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen, Denmark
LikeLiked by 1 person
Leonid, thank you for your important investigations.
I fully support Professor Cantera’s letter.
Xenia Schmalz
Post-doctoral researcher
Department of Developmental Psychology & Socialisation
Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully stand with Professor Cantera in support of Leonid Schneider
David Valle-Garcia
Harvard Medical School,
Boston, MA, USA
LikeLiked by 1 person
An in absentia court injunction to suppress public domain knowledge? Absurd. I support the open letter of Rafael Cantera
Mark Humphries, PhD
University of Manchester
LikeLiked by 1 person
I stand with Professor Cantera in support of Leonid Schneider.
Jonas Malmstedt, MD, PhD
Consultant Vascular Surgeon
Stockholm
LikeLiked by 1 person
While I am not trained in medicine and do not know the case of Macchiarini or the Walleses in detail, I am a strong supporter of the idea that science should be an open endeavour. All science should be open to further scrutiny, not least when people’s health or lives are at stake. Therefore I strongly support this call to support Leonid Schneider and his investigation and find the apparent methods of legally punishing him for merely repeating statements already made in public completely outrageous.
Thomas Arildsen
Associate Professor in Signal Processing at Aalborg University
LikeLiked by 1 person
I strongly support the letter by Rafael Cantera, the work of Leonid Schneider, fair trials, the right to defend yourself, and freedom of speech, no country can impose silence.
Graziella Pellegrini
Professor of Applied Biology
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Modena, Italy
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully support this letter and thank Leonid and others who have investigated this issue.
Professor Magnus Rattray
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health
University of Manchester, UK
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support the above letter
Prof Steve Paterson
Institute of Integrative Biology
University of Liverpool, UK
LikeLiked by 1 person
In support of the content of the above letter,
Dr. Anja Viehmann
Institute for General Medicine;
University Clinics Essen, Germany
LikeLiked by 1 person