<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://forbetterscience.com/2026/10/14/sweet-sixteen-retractions/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>For Better Science</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-10-14T05:00:00+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Sweet Sixteen Retractions</news:title><news:keywords>retraction, Elsevier, Germany, environmental sciences, paper mills, agriculture, Damia Barcelo, Jörg Rinklebe, Christian Sonne, Eder Lima, Pau Loke Show, Su Shiung Lam, Yakov Kuzyakov, Navid Rabiee, Daniel C.W. Tsang, Yong Sik Ok, Teofil Jesionowski, Mohammad Reza Saeb, Parvaiz Ahmad, Deyi Hou, Balal Yousaf, Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman, Kit Wayne Chew, Sabry Shaheen, Meththika Vithanage, Jason Unrine, Daniel Alessi, Filip Tack, Nanthi Bolan, Kadambot Siddique, Binoy Sarkar, Omid Akhavan, Ondřej Mašek</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://forbetterscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/wuppertal-piper-1-edited.jpeg?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>