The young star of microbiology Robert Ryan, rose to great heights only to be publicly shot down, without much of an explanation. Instead, newspapers were tipped-off underhand and internal emails discretely forwarded; the only half-way solid information we have is the evidence of image duplications in his papers as posted on PubPeer. Ryan now left the University of Dundee in Scotland; his institutional profile has been deleted. EMBO recently announced in a footnote that Ryan’s Young investigator Programme (YIP) funding was withdrawn.
Unlike the official news suggest though, Ryan did not resign. He was sacked, apparently after a half-a-year long external investigation organized by the University of Dundee and after appeals which involved lawyers on both sides. Unlike I previously assumed, there was no misconduct investigation by his main funder EMBO, the YIP funding was terminated upon unpublished notification forwarded to Ryan’s funders by the University of Dundee. The University College Cork (UCC) in Ireland claims to have initiated their own (also not officially announced) investigation which seems to involve Ryan’s former mentor and co-author on every single manipulations-tainted paper, Maxwell Dow. At least this is what I was told by direct sources, but again, there were no real official announcements whatsoever.
Not a single paper was directly fingered as unreliable; no recommendations for literature corrections were issued. The scientific community and the general public have been kept utterly in the dark, while Ryan’s colleagues and funders dealt with his case without divulging any information, aside of controlled leaks to media, like to select journalists. With some prodding, I was able to slightly lift the shroud of mystery around Ryan’s public career execution. Or maybe I was misled as well, do judge yourself.
In my previous report, I attempted to figure out why Ryan’s suspension from his position of group leader in Dundee was made public by the means of four major newspapers. His research group has been dissolved, meanwhile the misconduct investigation was only supposed at its beginning. This didn’t make any sense. A researcher who said to have known Ryan “vaguely” described him to me as “a serious and studious chap, but hugely talented”. Ryan’s mentor Dow is one of the biggest figures in the field of microbiology. Dozens of “zombie” scientists continue making bombastic careers despite very worrisome PubPeer histories and even officially confirmed earlier fraud records, with evidence of data manipulation much worse than that against Ryan. What happened?
This is what I learned via a direct message exchange with the person behind the official Twitter account MMB Dundee (@MMB_UoD), described as “The Division of Molecular Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee”. (Update 18.03.2017. Through a FOI inquiry to Dundee I found out the name of the person who used to operate this meanwhile inactive Twitter account, a Dundee professor. The transcript of our exchange is here).
The Ryan investigation began apparently as soon as the first PubPeer criticisms were placed against his and Dow’s papers in March-April 2016, just when he was receiving a €5000 Young Investigator Award from the European microbiology society ESCMID. That money Ryan might have just as well used for his lawyers at the misconduct investigation. This was namely what MMB Dundee wrote to me:
“Over six months of full – by the book – investigation. Legal repesentation on both sides. Internal and external members on the panel. Full, non-prejudicial and by the book”.
The newspapers reported on Ryan’s suspension on August 28th 2016. The investigation was most probably concluded by then and likely entered the stage of appeals, which made Ryan’s suspension possible. The email of the Dean of Dundee’s School of Life Sciences, Julian Blow, which was leaked to Retraction Watch, seems to confirm this supposition. Obviously Ryan’s appeal was unsuccessful; he was sacked and announced as having “resigned his position”. Blow did not reply to my email, one wonders in fact if the Dundee report or at least conclusions of that external investigation will ever be published. At least so that the microbiology community knows which of Ryan’s twelve criticised papers were investigated and if their results are still any trustworthy.
MMB Dundee also told me this:
“The Dean of Life Sciences at Dundee has informed all funders and charities”.
And indeed, EMBO rescinded Ryan’s funding on 10th November 2016, but issued no real public notification of this, aside of a tiny footnote here. Most probably the British funder Wellcome Trust has already followed suit regarding Ryan’s Senior Fellowship. Only 2 weeks ago I asked EMBO director Maria Leptin about any new developments, but received no reply. Now I was slightly luckier:
“The termination of Robert Ryan’s membership in the YIP is based on the now publicly available statement that ‘Dr Ryan has now resigned his position’ – in the link that you sent [that of Retraction Watch article, -LS], and which is I suppose how everyone else received the news as well. EMBO was informed of this by the University of Dundee a few days ago. EMBO has not conducted an investigation”.
I also asked the president of University College Cork, Michael Murphy, if they intend to run their own investigation as well, and also to include in it the UCC laboratory of Ryan’s former boss and mentor Dow. This is important in view that the latter is a key co-author on practically all examined publications which were now confirmed by the Dundee dean Blow as containing “misrepresentation of clinical data and the duplication and misrepresentation of images”. This was what Murphy eventually told me:
“UCC is committed to the highest standards in the conduct of research. A detailed investigation into all aspects of this case is underway. Until it has been completed the university is not in a position to comment”.
Of course I don’t know for sure what kind of investigation it is and if it is indeed already happening. Like the University of Dundee, UCC made no public announcement either. Everything is clouded and foggy in this mysterious Celtic saga.
Update 14.11.2016: the text above was corrected to fix a misunderstanding in my communications with EMBO director Maria Leptin. As she now clarified, the notification about YIP grant termination on Retraction Watch “definitely did not come from EMBO directly”.
Pingback: The mysterious public career execution of Robert Ryan – For Better Science
Call me unimpresed, but what EXACTLY are they blaming poor chap Paul Ryan for? And why that “full court press” and public career execution? Something smells fishy here.
Pingback: Ryan’s mentor Dow pretends copyright to combat my reporting – For Better Science
Just put onto this article by a tweet by Nick Schurch (@nickschurch) this afternoon. From what you have written it appears that someone behind this so-called MMB Dundee twitter account (@MMB_UoD) has been feeding you details. However, when you click on it there is no such account. Have you just got another leaked email from someone? Then given it a spin to make it look like you have some inside track on what is going on?
Interesting, the account used to exist, google it: @MMB_UoD. I did communicate over Twitter DM with the person behind it, but as I said I of course do not know who exactly it was. See how crazy this Ryan case is?
So what you are saying is that you have just reported facts that could be nonsense by “someone” in the MMB division that has an axe to grind? Is this really journalism? I find the whole thing rather unsavory. The “leaked” emails and unofficial statements to the press. You can see why Dow wants to see his image removed from you site I suppose. I would not have gone about it that way. Have you spoken to Ryan or Dow?
I can’t say I’m surprised by the lack of clarity and transparency you encountered in your dealings with Life Sciences at the Univeristy of Dundee. I resigned from Life Sciences last year as their Publicity and Communications Officer because of the culture of bullying and harassment which is endemic in the School (of Life Sciences) and which – in spite of the findings of an internal report saying this – the University refuses to acknowledge and so to address. I imagine Ryan’s students were victims of this culture of bullying and the organisation is now using the usual tactics – “culture of bullying? What cover-up?” – to avoid dealing with any of the issues relating to work ethic or research integrity.
I’ve used the opportunity to write a book about mismanagement in publicly-funded organisations- but still nothing about that particular organisation surprises me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have known Dr Ryan and Dr Dow for many years and one thing I would not describe either of them, as is being a bully. From what I understand Dr Ryan was one of the few PIs in the School of Life Sciences that didn’t “abuse” his students and staff. I have not gotten to speak to Dr Ryan or any of his postdocs as yet which is disappointing but I am now digging. I do agree that there are serious issues of mismanagement, bulling, and dare I say it racism in the Life Sciences at the University of Dundee. These have been ignored for years, as those that have being perpetrating them are considered research stars and have protection from senior advisors and have dragged massive financial funding to the School. Dr Ryan is a small fry in comparison. Please drop me an email and I can put you in contact with several individuals who may help with your book.
I still don’t believe Leonid is right in distorting “leaked” email or odd tweets (it would be great to see them).
Teddy (I assume it’s not your real name?), maybe you missed this article of mine: https://forbetterscience.com/2017/01/30/ryans-mentor-dow-pretends-copyright-to-combat-my-reporting/
How would you describe the behaviour of Max Dow here? Also note that his UCC refused to comment on this issue, never mind apologise.
Now, what exactly are you recurrently accusing me of? I proved to you that Twitter @MMB_UoD used to exist. Do you think I should never have shared the information I received over it? Why so?
Why don’t you invite your colleagues from Dundee to tell us what is happening?
I am not sure how I would describe Max Dow’s behavior but the fact you are just speculating about him and sticking his image up on your site is a little tactless. I’m not condoning the approach he appears to have taken. I do think it is a big leap to say he is trying to silence you. Have you contacted him? Have you confirmed anything?
Anyway I’m not accusing you of anything just pointing out the fact that you have provided no evidence that the Twitter @MMB_UoD was functional or that the things you were told are true. It seems like you are making a lot of speculation which is only backed partly by fact.
TD, I am finishing this discussion with you now. You saw the evidence the Twitter account used to be functional and you do know that I did try to contact Dow. You do know that Dow attempted to have my reporting about him removed by DMCA takedown claims, illegally, but you declare myself the morally guilty party here.
Please restrict your further comments to factual debate.
I too know Robert Ryan and am not suggesting that he is or was bully – but a culture of bullying and harassment means that everyone feels a great deal of pressure to perform to unrealistic capacities. My point was more that the Univeristy of Dundee has previous form in rewriting history and covering up any bad behaviour including that of poor management. From your response I see that you also recognise that there is a problem.
I can affirm that an MMB Twitter account did exist though I have no idea who in MMB was managing this. I share Leonid’s frustration at not being able to get a response or reasonable communication from the School or the University. The truth is always hard to discover and mistakes to be learned from when organisations go to such lengths to cover up poor management and lack of accountability.
Thank you for the offer but my book Bullying for Beginners is already out in paperback and on kindle. I notified the University senior management (as a courtesy) that I was publishing it and sent a link to the book. I’ve not had a response or comment from them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good for you Sarah! I will buy and read your book…
It is astonishing how people like the pseudonym “Teddy” are so authoritarian that they do not tolerate criticism. They try to come to silence voices like Leonid’s like a grandma gives crap to a child. Ohhh please! Why so much panic to critics?
Pingback: The mysterious public career execution of Robert Ryan – For Better Science
Pingback: Lack of transparency in ERC funding decisions, by Shravan Vasishth – For Better Science
Pingback: After misconduct investigation, Irina Stancheva left Edinburgh, in secret – For Better Science